Before we do Big Data we need to do Clean Data

Collecting, analysing, and making decisions with massive amounts of data is something digital and IT departments in all kinds of companies across all kinds of industries aspire to. But if the data being collected isn’t clean, isn’t trustworthy, isn’t reliable then it’s going to lead to questionable results or complete errors.

Bucks Mind Strategy Planning

image

Board of Trustees, CEO, Senior Management Team, and Staff Team all working towards to develop the strategic direction for the charity. The challenge now is to distill the aspirations down to achievables, set targets, and create an implementation plan. Lots more work to do.

How many people will get help from the extra £1bn for Mental Services?

The main story in the news today is the extra £1bn a year that the NHS is to receive for Mental Health services by 2020.

A quick look at the numbers:

  • UK Population: 64,100,000
  • 1 in 4 people suffer from mental health issues: 16,025,000
  • A quarter of those receive treatment from the NHS: 4,006,250
  • The NHS spends £92bn a year on Mental Health.
  • That’s a spend £22,964,118 per person.
  • An additional £1bn spent will mean an additional 43,546 more people receive treatment (at the same spend per person).
  • That’s a total of 4,049,796 people receiving treatment each year.
  • And a total of 11,975,204 not receiving treatment each year.

This raises a few questions for me:

  • Is almost £23 million pounds per person per year the right amount to be spending on treatment? Is it really cost effective?
  • What about the almost twelve million people still not receiving an treatment?
  • If spending £92bn enables the NHS to treat 6.25% of the population, and the additional £1bn takes that up to 6.32%, then treating the entire 25% of the population that are affected by mental health issues would cost a total of £368bn a year.  Is £1bn really enough?

Drops, the app that rounds up credit card purchases to donate to charity

Drops is an app that connects to your bank account and allows you to round up purchases and donate that amount to the charity of your choice. The service doesn’t charge a commission but allows you to ‘tip’ them.

It seems like a good idea but I think it’ll struggle to get adopted, even by good-hearted regular givers to charity, and struggle even more to maintain continued use. Charitable giving works best when there is an emotional reward, and an app that sells itself as donating the money you won’t notice has no way of providing that reward.

How The Independant’s shift from print to digital reveals the difficulty with digital content business models

The Independent is going digital, scraping its print version to save costs and attempt to become a world-class world-wide digital publisher.

Phil Hall, joint head of investment for Mediacom UK, said in The Drum:

The print sales are low and obviously there is a production cost involved in producing print and this is part of the reason for their shift to a digital business. While they have a decent digital subscriber base, the challenge as it is for any digital business will be to monetise that. There is certainly a possibility that they will look at a subscriber model, or they can hope that the quality of their journalism is such that they will generate more traffic and get a greater return from advertising.

The move to ‘more digital’ or ‘digital only’ content is clearly an attractive trend for a every business that deals with content. Digital production, done right so it can be repurposed, can be more cost effective than print so it’s easy to see why any content producer would shift to digital over print. But, as The Independent shows, its not quite that simple. Just being more cost effective in production doesn’t necessarily lead to greater revenue in consumption. People may well consume more content via digital means, but they do so in a very different way. Articles are read, photos looked at, and videos watched with a fast-paced throwaway approach. On the other hand, we have an innate feeling that words and images in print are somehow immortalised and so more precious, that we should take time over reading them, and pay them more attention.

This difference in consumption is what makes the digital business model so difficult to make profitable. As Phil said above, The Independant has only two potential income streams: subscription and advertising. The Subscription Model is a difficult one to get right for a newspaper as it needs to make its best content publicly available to show its quality and value, in which case subscribers are left with paying for lower quality content, and the Advertising Model, which is under increasing pressure because of the rise of ad blocking software.

Other types of organisations face the same issue. A charity could quite sensibly choose to move more of its print content to digital formats, and justify this move as saving print and distribution costs. But that fundraising campaign flyer that drops through your letterbox might hang around longer and be taken notice of more than the banner ad that you didn’t even notice as you were reading an article on The Independant’s website.

I’m a believer in all things digital, and of the digital transformation of organisations and society, but I also believe in knowing what you are trying to achieve and understanding the end-to-end process and impact of decisions like ‘going digital’. Perhaps digital, with its limited revenue models, will force organisations to accept more streamlined and smaller business models. Perhaps it will force businesses to accept lower revenue in return for greater cost-effectiveness. Perhaps ten percent profit on one million pounds turnover is better than one percent profit on one hundred million pounds turnover.