Getting to zero information

In The New New Product Development Game, Hirotaka Takeuchi and Ikujiro Nonaka talk about teams starting with “zero information”- where prior knowledge does not apply. The team is given a “broad goal or a general strategic direction” and allowed to exist in a state of ambiguity.

One of the benefits of working as a cross-functional team is that as each member shares knowledge, all the other teams members learn. And the team begins to work as a unit in developing the knowledge it needs to create the right product.

This also creates challenge for the team. Getting to zero information, to beginner’s mind, a state where the team doesn’t hold onto assumptions that cloud their judgement, is a difficult thing to achieve. Separating the knowledge that gives the team a solid grounding from the knowledge that takes the team in the wrong direction is difficult. Difficult, but important to do.

What product/market fit might look like for charities

The concept of product/market fit was created by Andy Rachleff, from Benchmark Capital, and Don Valentine, from Sequoia Capital. And then popularized by venture capitalist Marc Andreessen. This means the concept has a very specific context and history, which makes it slightly problematic for other contexts.

With that said, let’s see how the concept might be applied to a charity context.

Product/market fit means being in a good market with a product that can satisfy that market

– Marc Andreessen

In a charity setting, the dynamics of product/market fit are very different.

The market isn’t made up of customers who are or aren’t willing to pay for the product, which means that willingness can’t be used as a signal of fit. For charities, the market is three-sided with the user, the funder and the charity. A good market would be one where the people are facing a significant problem that funders want to support solutions to.

Charities tackle wicked problems. Even the most successful products are only ever a small part of solving wicked problems, which means the product can’t provide clear signals of how well it is satisfying a market need.

Product/market fit is an important concept for charity product management, but it needs a lot more work to understand it properly.

The soft power of civil society

The North Wind and the Sun had a difference of opinion. The North Wind boasted of great strength. But the Sun argued that there was power in gentleness.

“We shall have a contest,” the North Wind bellowed. They looked down upon a man wearing a warm winter coat. “As a test of strength,” said the North Wind, “let us see which of us can take the coat off of that man. I’ll go first”.

The Wind blew so hard, the birds clung to the trees. The world was filled with dust and leaves. But the harder the wind blew, the tighter the shivering man clung to his coat.

Then, the Sun came out from behind a cloud, and the man turned down his collar. Sun warmed the air and the frosty ground, and the man unbuttoned his coat. The sun grew brighter and brighter, and soon the man felt so hot, he took off his coat and sat down in a shady spot.

This kind of power is everywhere. Soft power – getting others to want the outcomes that you want – co-opts people rather than coerces them. Hard power is easy to recognise, it typically relies on carrots and sticks, rewards and punishments, coercing others. But soft power is the ability to change what others do by changing what they want.

Joseph Nye coined the term, “soft power” in 1990, as the Cold War was coming to an end. In same year, McDonald’s opened a restaurant at Pushkin Square in Moscow in one of the most famous examples of soft power used on a global scale. At the time, there was the belief that if America exported enough fast food, blue jeans, and rock ‘n’ roll around the world, then everywhere else would adopt American cultural ideals and values. Exporting American culture to other countries changed what the people of those countries did by changing what they wanted.

Of course, soft power existed before 1990, it just didn’t have a name. Civil society organisations have always used soft power to achieve their aims. They have no means of coercing or paying people to do something, so the only option is a soft power approach.

The Keep Britain Tidy campaign used soft power to get people to want what Keep Britain Tidy wanted, and to change their behaviour to achieve it. Starting in 1955, the campaign encouraged people to put their rubbish in bins. Throughout the decades the campaign has exercised soft power in many ways.

When Nye explains the concept of soft power, he talks about ‘attraction and persuasion’. Making the outcome attractive is as important as persuading people to want to achieve it. Wanting our local communities and open spaces to be free of rubbish sounds like an attractive outcome, but sometimes it’s not enough.

The Bin It for Good campaign incentivised people to put their litter in a bin by offering another benefit to the local community. Bins were transformed into charity collection tins with a new local charity or cause each month. The more litter that went into the bins, the more money the featured charity or cause received. Not only was the idea of cleaner streets attractive to people, but their litter becoming a donation to charity was even more attractive. In three years, Bin it for Good prevented an estimated 34,314 items of litter from being dropped on the ground, and raised more than £10,800 for participating charities.

The International Tidy Man symbol was more subtle but long-lasting. It appeared on many crisp packets, soft drink cans, and chewing gum packets to remind people to put the packaging in the bin. It was the persuasion of soft power, the constant prompt to do the right thing.

Interestingly, there were also hard power elements to the campaign. When littering became an offense with a fine, suddenly there was a ‘stick’ for beating those that littered. But it wasn’t the civil society organisation that was wielding that power. They influenced the holders of that hard power to act on their behalf, making it another great example of using soft power.

A survey by Keep Britain Tidy in 2012 showed that seven out of ten people would feel guilty about dropping litter. That’s the result of soft power in action. What seemed like an inconsequential thing became something to feel guilty about in less than sixty years. The campaign achieved a generational shift in attitudes towards litter. That is soft power in action.

This is how all civil society operates. Hard power is for the state. Soft power is for those organisations that want to influence and persuade. It is by successfully exercising their soft power that civil society organisations bring about change in society.

Civil society is the sun that shines down on us, gently warming us until we take off our coat’s.


Digital trails: managing documentation for fast moving projects

Managing documentation for fast moving projects is a challenge. Different formats, different platforms, different people., different ways of working.

Maintaining a single database that links to all the documentation, in a way that makes sense for people unfamiliar with the work would be a full time job.

I like the idea of leaving digital trails. Every new document links to relevant, earlier documents. This creates a trail, a timeline of the work, where anyone starting with a recent document can find they way all the way back to the start of the project.

When can product managers be creative?

Product management, especially for modern digital products, is an analytical pursuit. All that user behaviour data, market analysis data, and scientific approach means that the majority of a product managers job involves analytical thinking and rational decision-making.

But there are times when a product manager needs to apply some creative thinking.

Analysis can show what the problem is, but creativity is needed to think of ways to solve it. Analysis can show which feature isn’t performing as expected, but creativity is needed to find the changes that will make it achieve.

The Double Diamond innovation process shows stages of divergent and convergent thinking. Any time I’ve seen anyone using it, their focus has been on the four stages rather than the different ways of thinking during the stages, so I think the power of switching between analytical and creative thinking gets lost, but it is a real skill. And knowing when to switch is essential for good product management.