Weeknotes 296

Did:

Objectives

I’ve been working on how we can use annual objectives in a more effective way to drive improvements for our team. We each have five objects and we’ve come up with themes for each to help us align them and make sure we’re all working on similar things. We’re going have monthly review sessions to keep us on track and make any changes we think we need. It’ll be interesting to see if we can turn objectives into something that is useful for the team.

Magix Teams

I bought a domain name and starting writing some notes about what use a website about magix teams could be, and when I get time I’ll get the website set up. So far, the hardest part of the ideas is the rationale for using a magix approach to organising teams but it seems like it might only be relevant for small, resource-constrained organisations (like charities).

Our systems treat us as objects

This week’s Irregular Ideas newsletter was inspired by my recent hospital experience and explores how systems can only treat people as objects with a set of attributes, which seems like it might have been a bot of what Baudrillard was talking about with the triumph of the object.

Read:

How to decide what to work on

This is an interesting look at opportunity and focus that applies well to side-projects. I’ve been struggling to focus over the past two months so I’m keen to back into working on various side-projects, and sometimes reading something like this is part of getting back on track.

Digital Enquirer

The Become A Digital Enquirer website is interesting, not just because it’s about online safety which is something I’m interested in, but because it uses online learning to get the message across and develop skills, which is an approach I’m keen on (that’s why so many of my side-projects are email courses)

Goodbye Standups, Hello Wrap-Ups

Goodbye Standups, Hello Wrap-Ups looks like an interesting experiment in rethinking team alignment for asynchronous, remote work.

My reading list

https://rogerswannell.notion.site/470f0d005b6641a1a3290ba170796141?v=baf49cd5964e44af8b5fddaf29abd765

Thought:

Building confidence

If you want to be good racing driver you need to have lots and lots of practise laps. The more times you drive around the track the better you become, and that builds your confidence. If you only practice one section of the track, however good you become at the section you’ll never become good at the whole track track. And if you only practice that section a few times a year you don’t get enough reps in to hone your skills you’ll have less confidence. Teams feeling confident in their problem solving ability only comes from getting the reps in.

No frameworks

An anti-framework position has been showing up in some of my thinking recently, from how to become more agile at work to thinking about how frameworks reduce creative problem solving.

Ideas in progress

I’ve had a few attempts at trying to create a more cohesive collection of my ideas, and I’ve been thinking about updating the home page on my website as a starting point, so it’s on my to do list for next week.

Retrospective March 2022

This month’s lesson is the same as last months. I didn’t get an effective structure in place for working projects so didn’t make any progress.

Contributing to the digital transformation of the charity sector

Pretty good month at work with my focus continuing to be split across building the team, getting foundations in place for greater robustness and resiliency in the future, and planning for new product development.

Still haven’t spent any time trying to figure out this goal outside of work.

Learning about innovation, technology, product and design

I didn’t do any formal learning this month. I’m still really behind on my British Sign Language course.

Didn’t work on any of my projects.

Read a pretty wide range of stuff from philosophy to digital transformation, mostly as research for Irregular Ideas and

Irregular Ideas is going well and has 30 subscribers. I enjoy writing it each week.

I wrote weeknotes on schedule every week.

Leading an intentional life

My nomadic life along the coastline was on pause. Back soon.

My financial measures are doing well.

I’m still not doing enough to improve my physical health.

Weeknotes 300

This week I did:

Standards

I’ve been using an inductive reasoning ‘practice into principles’ approach to take from some of the work I’ve been doing recently and shape up some standards that we can use to evaluate products. It’s interesting how different aspects of standardisation are at different stages of maturity and adoption. For example, password security has some good practice guidelines from NCSC but assessing the environmental impact of a website has lots of emerging tools but no agreed standard yet. Nothing is ever finished, everything evolves, and so if you’re referencing those things you need to be able to evolve with each of them.

When future shock is the norm

This week’s Irregular Ideas newsletter explores what effects virtual reality might have on our relationship with technology and ability to handle so much change.

Too many domain names?

I listed all the domain names I own. 52. That’s about the normal amount, right? I think starting an new idea with a domain name starts to give the idea branding and identity, and whatever you do with that domain name such as redirecting to Notion workspace or building a website, the previous links always go to where you want them to.

Open benches

I listed my first memorial bench on Open Benches. It’s very cool (the project, not the bench).

Projects

I updated my projects page to include some of my more recent projects and remove the images. I also started trying to standardise each of the project pages a bit more.

And thought about:

Goals

I’ve spent quite a lot of time this week reflecting on how I’m working towards my goals, looking back over the hypothesis mapping I did a while ago and looking for some criteria to judge whether the things I’m doing are likely to increase the chances of achieving the goals or not.

I read:

The Evolution of Learning to Edutainment 3.0

This presentation about the future of learning is very cool (except it’s focus on pedagogy rather than andragogy).

Who gets to choose?

There is a lot of talk about algorithmic bias. But who gets to decide which moral intuitions, which values, should be embedded in algorithms in order to overcome that bias? That seems like an impossible question to me. Algorithms can’t be fair because humans don’t know how to be fair. The answer then, is to make algorithms of different moral persuasions and let them fight it out in constant, real-time battles, just like the human moral landscape.

A reading list about brighter futures

This wonderful inspiring list of stories about the future.